Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • AAP Policy
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Policy
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effect on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Insights
  • AAP Career Center
  • Subscribe
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • AAP Policy
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Policy
  • Pediatric Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Racism and Its Effect on Pediatric Health
    • More Collections...
  • Multimedia
    • Video Abstracts
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Insights
  • AAP Career Center
  • Subscribe

Journals Blog

  • Visit AAP News on Facebook
  • Follow AAP News on Twitter

Paying for Milk

Lydia Furman, MD, Assistant Editor, Pediatrics
February 28, 2018

In a recently released article in Pediatrics, Dr. Susan Trang and colleagues (10.1542/peds.2017-0737)Assistant Editor, Pediatrics ask an important question: is donor milk for premature infants cost-effective? The cost of donor milk is high in comparison to preterm formula, and hence the authors’ question is meaningful for both healthcare consumers and payers. However, breast milk, including donor human milk, has been well shown to reduce the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), a disastrous, life-threatening complication of prematurity.1 Certainly parents and physicians want the best for each infant regardless of cost, but determining cost-effectiveness, or “bang for the buck” is an important transparency.

In this prospective randomized trial, 363 premature infants of mean gestational age of 27.7 weeks and mean birthweight of 996 grams were enrolled and randomized to receive either donor human milk or preterm formula if mother’s breastmilk was not sufficient in supply. Results from this trial have previously been published related to neurodevelopmental outcomes.2 The cost-effectiveness analysis described here by Dr. Trang and colleagues was pre-planned, and was conducted in tandem with the feeding trial. The authors clearly explain how costs associated with the study infants’ hospital care were calculated, primarily with a standardized accounting system: these included hospital stay costs (for example laboratory, medication and imaging costs), provider salaries, and indirect institutional costs allocated by length of the infant’s hospital stay. Post-discharge health and non-health costs were captured with a previously validated Family Health Economic Questionnaire filled out monthly; this questionnaire included the cost of parental missed work due to infant illness.

The cost of donor milk varies but is generally estimated as $3-5 per ounce, which includes both direct costs such as screening of donors, and processing and pasteurizing of breast milk, and indirect costs such as research and infrastructure. Both not-for profit (HMBANA - the Human Milk Banking Association of North America) and for-profit milk banks (Prolacta® Bioscience Inc.) supply donor human milk to hospitals. Dr. Trang et al use a cost of $4.95 (Canadian dollars) per ounce for donor human milk (with an additional $0.14 to fortify the donor milk so that protein, calories and micronutrients are sufficient), versus $0.13 dollars for bovine-based preterm formula. The difference in cost is striking. Many hospitals continue to receive preterm formula free from vendors, but this practice is not permitted for Baby Friendly designated birthing hospitals who must pay “fair market” price; including a cost for formula acknowledges the societal cost (and actual cost for Baby Friendly designated hospitals) of formula.3

At the end of the day, mean total cost from birth through 18 months corrected age was the same in both groups! However, the authors help us understand the difference between cost and cost-effectiveness by explaining the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) and the uncertainties associated with decision-making relative to cost – how many dollars are decision-makers willing to spend to prevent one case of NEC? For non-economists, this explanation is truly enlightening. And while total initial hospitalization charges were the same for both groups, what do you predict for the post-discharge period? Read on for this interesting result!  

References:

1. Quigley M, McGuire W Formula versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 22;(4):CD002971.

2. Unger S, Gibbins S, Zupancic J, O’Connor DL. DoMINO: Donor milk for improved neurodevelopmental outcomes. BMC Pediatrics. 2014;14:123.

3. Baby-Hospital USA. https://www.babyfriendlyusa.org/  (accessed 2/7/2018)

  • Impact of Donor Milk Availability on Breast Milk Use and Necrotizing Enterocolitis Rates
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Pediatrics

Advertising Disclaimer »

Download PDF
Share
Paying for Milk
Lydia Furman, MD
February 28, 2018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email Blog Post

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Paying for Milk
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Digital Edition Current Issue
  • Latest Daily News
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Columns
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe to AAP News Magazine
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • 2021 AAP Journals Catalog
  • Pediatrics
  • Pediatrics in Review
  • Hospital Pediatrics
  • NeoReviews
  • AAP Grand Rounds
  • AAP Career Center
  • shopAAP
  • AAP.org
  • AAP News
  • Visit AAP News on Facebook
  • Follow AAP News on Twitter
American Academy of Pediatrics

© 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics